Recent advances in the development of large language models have resulted in public access to state-of-the-art pre-trained language models (PLMs), including Generative Pre-trained Transformer 3 (GPT-3) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT). However, evaluations of PLMs, in practice, have shown their susceptibility to adversarial attacks during the training and fine-tuning stages of development. Such attacks can result in erroneous outputs, model-generated hate speech, and the exposure of users' sensitive information. While existing research has focused on adversarial attacks during either the training or the fine-tuning of PLMs, there is a deficit of information on attacks made between these two development phases. In this work, we highlight a major security vulnerability in the public release of GPT-3 and further investigate this vulnerability in other state-of-the-art PLMs. We restrict our work to pre-trained models that have not undergone fine-tuning. Further, we underscore token distance-minimized perturbations as an effective adversarial approach, bypassing both supervised and unsupervised quality measures. Following this approach, we observe a significant decrease in text classification quality when evaluating for semantic similarity.

With the recent outbreak of COVID-19, creating a means to stop it's spread and eventually develop a vaccine are the most important and challenging tasks that the scientific community is facing right now. The first step towards these goals is to correctly identify a patient that is infected with the virus. Our group applied an unsupervised machine learning technique to identify COVID-19 cases. This is an important topic as COVID-19 is a novel disease currently being studied in detail and our methodology has the potential to reveal important differences between it and other viral pneumonia. This could then, in turn, enable doctors to more confidently help each patient. Our experiments utilize Principal Component Analysis (PCA), t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), and the recently developed Robust Continuous Clustering algorithm (RCC). We display the performance of RCC in identifying COVID-19 patients and its ability to compete with other unsupervised algorithms, namely K-Means++ (KM++). Using a COVID-19 Radiography dataset, we found that RCC outperformed KM++; we used the Adjusted Mutual Information Score (AMI) in order to measure the effectiveness of both algorithms. The AMI for the two and three class cases of KM++ were 0.0250 and 0.054, respectively. In comparison, RCC scored 0.5044 in the two class case and 0.267 in the three class case, clearly showing RCC as the superior algorithm. This not only opens new possible applications of RCC, but it could potentially aid in the creation of a new tool for COVID-19 identification.